Change must come from the barrel of a gun
Jan 10th, 2009 by Niko de Lyko
Since the passages about your submission to authority in the “Holy” book—both in the old (and new testaments, are on one hand so many that it would take us hours to quote, and on the other run the danger of being interpreted as “deep” and “allegorical” no matter how plain, we give you quoted straight enough, one (of them prophets and missionaries who wrote those passages) spiritual successor:
“God would prefer to suffer the government to exist no matter how evil, rather than to allow the rabble to riot, no matter how justified they are in doing so”.
“A prince should remain a prince no matter how tyrannical he may be.
He beheads necessarily only a few since he must have subjects to be ruler”.
“Nothing is more poisonous, harmful or devilish than a man in rebellion”.
Yeah. In the words of “reformer” Martin Luther King, mostly “Against the robbing and murdering hordes of peasants”.
This from Dr. Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Minister of Propaganda:
“…virtually important to the state to use all its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and so by extension, the truth becomes the greatest enemy of the state”.
And this (to us referring), from late CIA director William Colby, one of his (with nothing metaphorical about it) successors:
“They are dangerous because there are so many of them.
It is one thing to have a few nuts or dissidents. They can be dealt with, justly or otherwise, so they do not pose a danger to the system.
It is quite another situation when you have a true movement—millions of citizens believing something, particularly when the movement is made up of society’s average, successful citizens”.
So?
What do you reckon God would prefer?
Pepsi or Coca-Cola?
This touches on an interesting assembledge point that exists in most ‘ordered’ places. It is the state of mind described as an “Apologist”
An Apologist apologies for the person that is fucking them in the ass.
“well its ok because if I do this, then I can do that later”
“well its ok- that just how they are”
“well its ok - its not so bad once you get used to it”
the issue is not getting fucked in the ass, because some people may like that. the point is that an apologist does NOT like what is happening to them and instead of rebelling, then apoligize for and thus justify to their petty ego what is happening to them.
eat some some wolfman pellets and howl at the moon man